Saturday, October 25, 2014

The Orchestra's Tutti vs. The Soloist's Cadenza

Best of the Tales on Vacation:  The fetching Mrs. B and I are on a short weekend getaway, so please enjoy this repeat classical music post from the Tales

The Orchestra's Tutti vs. The Soloist's Cadenza:
In a concerto you have a soloist playing along with the symphony orchestra. The soloist will be alongside the conductor in front of the orchestra.  I have seen different meanings for concerto but will go along with the one my daughter's esteemed Russian American piano teacher gave-contest.   In that sense a concerto is like a competition between the soloist and the orchestra.  In reality, the soloist and orchestra are working together to make beautiful music.

For much of the concerto the soloist and orchestra will be playing together.  But there are moments in the concert where they will not be playing together. Those times when you see the orchestra playing without the soloist is called tutti.  Most concertos will have many tuttis, where the whole orchestra is playing while the soloist is silent. In most classical concertos, there will be a long tutti at the beginning of the concerto before the soloist enters the fray.

So, there are times when the orchestra plays without the soloist. What about the soloist playing without the orchestra?  While there are usually certain passages when the soloist plays by himself, there is a special moment [and a longer period of time], usually near the end of the first movement, when the soloist plays without the orchestra in order to exhibit his/her virtuosity.  That is called a cadenza.  When the cadenza occurs, you will see the conductor instructing  the orchestra with his baton to be silent and to put their instruments in a non playing position.  That is when the soloist takes over to "show his stuff."

As I said, the cadenza will usually take place in the first movement, but every once in a while you will find a cadenza in either the second or third movement, also.  When the cadenza occurs, all eyes in the concert hall then turn to the soloist.

While there will be only one cadenza [with very few exceptions] in a movement of a concerto, there will usually be many tuttis that give a break to the soloist as he gets to rest while the orchestra is playing alone. 

In Beethoven's first piano concerto, there is a great illustration of both a tutti passage by the orchestra and the soloist's cadenza, as both are exaggerated for an extended period of time.  Like in many classical concerti, the concerto begins with a long tutti, as the orchestra [without the soloist] gives an introduction of the various themes you are about to hear in the concerto.  In Beethoven's C Major piano concerto notice that the opening tutti lasts for almost three minutes before the soloist enters.

Then near the end of the first movement Beethoven has written one of the longest cadenzas for the soloist that you will ever hear.  In this video the cadenza starts at 12:40 and lasts until 17:25, before the orchestra comes in to end the first movement.

Note: In this video the pianist is also the conductor. 

I love this concerto.  Beethoven's first concerto was actually written second, but it was called number one because it was published before the first one he wrote.  Only Beethoven's 5th piano concerto, "The Emperor", tops this one in my opinion.  All five of Beethoven's piano concerti are great, but this is my second favorite of the five.

Please turn up the volume to enjoy the first movement of this masterpiece piano concerto by the great Ludwig Van Beethoven.

L.V. Beethoven: Piano Concerto #1 in C Major, Movement 1, Allegro con Brio:

Friday, October 24, 2014

Time To Call Chris Matthews What He Is - A Racist

This double standard has to stop, now!  What double standard?  Where a liberal commentator can make stupid hate speech attacking conservative Republicans and there not being even the blink of an eye by the main stream media, when a similar comment made by a Republican would be plastered all over the print and visual media for days on end and there would be a demand on every Republican being interviewed that they disassociate themselves from the person who made it.  

Chris "the racist" Matthews
Who is one of the kings in making such hate filled derogatory comments about the GOP, Chris Matthews of MSNBC.  He has time and again gone out of his way accusing the Republicans of racism and hate, when he is the one who is spewing the hate, and I submit is the real racist.  I agree with Greg Gutfeld who has said many times, the Democrats who make ridiculous statements falsely accusing the GOP and conservatives of being racists, should be called out for what they are: racists. They are the ones who see every issue in terms of race, not the Republicans.

Check this latest out from Western [on October 22, 2014]: "The liberal Chris Matthews, on his show “Hardball”, came right out and accused the Republican Party of “killing the black vote” by having voter ID laws in place, or, as he says it, making “sure that the sons and daughters of slaves have the hardest possible time getting into the voting booth.”

Think about what he said.  Voter ID laws, that require you to show an ID to vote kills the black vote and makes sure they [blacks] have the hardest possible time getting in the voting booth. What?  We are living in the 21st century and Chris Matthews thinks requiring an ID to vote is aimed at black people.  Why do you think that is, Chris?  Because black people aren't as sophisticated enough to get an ID like a white person can?  So, black people don't drive cars and get driving licenses like white people, Chris?

Think how condescending and belittling to black people that is, Chris Matthews.  In my mind, that makes you are the racist Chris Matthews and I am calling you on it.

What Chris Matthews said is not just degrading to black people, it is also just plain stupid.  If we are to believe what Chris Matthews has said, that to ask for an ID to vote is aimed at suppressing the black vote, then how racist does that make the FAA, Chris?  Using your logic, the FAA, by requiring anyone who wants to fly show their ID, are obviously trying to prevent black people from flying. Why don't you call out the FAA for "their" racism, Chris?  You should be outraged that this federal agency is targeting black people and that they must only want white people to travel by airplane. 

What about the banks Chris?  To open up an account at a bank you must first show your ID.  According to you, the banks only want white people's money in the bank, as they are obviously [by requiring an ID to open a bank account] trying to suppress black account holders. 

What about applying for a passport, Chris Matthews?  How racist is the State Department, requiring that you must show an ID [among other things I am sure also aimed at black people] before you can even think about getting a passport.  Why don't you call the state department on their racism as, according to you, they must obviously want to suppress black people from getting a passport. 

And I could go on and on about the things you need an ID to be able to do in this country.  Well, I guess in your eyes Chris Matthews, that just proves how this whole country is racist.  They don't want black people to do anything.

Chris Matthews, stop your hate speech once and for all.  The mainstream media may overlook it because you are one of them, a liberal Democrat, but this blog is calling you on it, you racist.

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Jewish Students Expose Anti-Semitism On College Campuses

Hat Tip To:

A great American patriot and friend of Israel, my Aunt Carla, in St. Louis who sent me this video.  When sending it  she told me her brother was a member of the AEPi Jewish fraternity and she was the "sweetheart", so it made her feel so proud of these Jewish students for making this video and exposing the disgusting anti-Semitism and anti-Israel sentiment on college campuses. Also, hat tip to Aaron Goldenberg of Jewish voices on campus on You tube for this video.

I knew with the disgusting BDS [boycott, divestment, sanctions] movement against Israel going on all over the world and on college campuses around the world, there has been a lot of anti-Israel sentiment at the supposed higher institutions of learning.  Special thanks to great patriots like Truth Revolt founder Ben Shapiro who have taken on this movement. Ben actually has called out the people in this movement for what they are, anti-Jew hate bigots.

Please check out this post we did on Ben, called: "Ben Shapiro, Profile in Greatness".

This video made by some great Jewish college students, many from the fraternity, AEPi, demonstrates that there is not just anti-Israel sentiment on college campuses in the United States and Canada, but actual anti-Semitism on the campuses resulting in some attacks on Jewish students.

Think about that, in the year 2014 there are actually college campuses where Jewish students have to be on the lookout for violent attacks that may occur against them.

Thanks for the following video published on Oct 3, 2014 by Aaron Goldenberg on You Tube.

Jewish Students Expose Anti-Semitism on College Campuses:

Bravo to these Jewish students who made this expose!    Good work!

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Did Mara Liasson Demean Women's Intelligence? UPDATE - Oct. 22, 2014

I published this post in April of this year entitled: "Did Mara Liasson Demean Women's Intelligence?"

I am bringing it back because I humbly think it was very prescient in it's basic conclusion: That I have more faith in women than does Mara Liasson because I predicted the Democrats [led by President Obama's] "war on women" rhetoric would not work this election year and it would show up in the election results.

As you see in the article, Mara thought the war on woman rhetoric [even if the facts weren't there to back up the Democrats claims] was a good smart political move that was being made because it would work.  [implied: like it always does] 

As you can tell by some of the replies, and also by some of the comments I got on twitter, I was criticized in believing the war on women rhetoric would not work this time, and a lot of people said, no, Mara was right and I was naïve. 

Well we still have to wait a couple of weeks for the election results, but initial signs are going good for the Tales position. :-)

Look at these recent headlines that have just come out in the news:

From ABC news: "is the War on women backfiring on the Democrats"

From the Catholic Register: "Is the Democrats War on Women Rhetoric Backfiring in 2014"

From The Colorado Observer: "Poll: Democrats War on Women has backfired"

From Newsmax commenting on Commentary Magazine's Jonathan Tobin: "Dems [war on women] Strategy on GOP Backfiring"

From The College Republican: "Democrats are Losing the War on Women"

From The [Colorado] Gazette: "War on Women Backfires on Udall"

From "Dem's War on Women Campaign Backfires"

I would say case closed, but it still isn't closed until we find out the election results on Nov. 4.  I hope and pray I am right with a big Republican wave that drowns the Democrats "war on women" rhetoric once and for all.

Please read the following article I did on Mara Liasson [as I stated in the article, someone who I really like, and like to hear her opinions] and I hope you will agree with me, the Tales might just turn out to be right.
From April 16, 2014: "Did Mara Liasson Demean Women's Intelligence?"

Mara Liasson
I like NPR and Fox News Channel's Mara Liasson.  She is a liberal and I disagree with her position most of the time, but she is usually very thoughtful with her comments and I've noticed is also very attentive and respecting when a conservative, such as Charles Krauthammer, makes his opinion known.  I do not want this post to be an attack on Mara Liasson, but I am just asking this question I put in the title of this post.

So, that is why I was kind of surprised at her position [given on Fox News Channel Special Report Show on Tuesday April 8, 2014] on president Obama's call for equal pay for women, especially as he used bogus statistics and he revealed total hypocrisy in his call, as his White House does not meet the standards of equal pay for women that he demands of the private sector.

Listen to Charles Krauthammer on the topic, Special Report Panel, April 8, 2014:

Mara was listening with great respect to Charles, but then made this statement "Everything you say Charles may be true" and then she said [paraphrasing], "but this [Obama's rhetoric] will have an affect on women and it is a good political move by the president to help the Democrats in November."

Think about what Mara said.  Even if everything Dr. Krauthammer said was true about president Obama's lying demagoguery, those real facts wouldn't matter to women and they would fall for the emotional rhetoric by the president even though his statements were false.

I respect Mara Liasson, but isn't that demeaning to women about their intelligence and ability to reason?  Remember she began her statement of approval of president Obama's statement, by allowing that "everything [Charles Krauthammer] said may be true."   So, it wasn't "I don't agree with your assertions Charles" which if she had made that qualification, I wouldn't be writing this post.  I think, and what I was hoping Mara Liasson would have said in response to Charles Krauthammer was, "If what you are saying is true Charles, then I think women will be intelligent enough to see through the president's rhetoric, and his statements will not help and could actually backfire on the Democrats in the upcoming elections." 

I have more respect for women's intelligence than Mara and believe they will determine the facts and make a reasoned decision about the president's and Democrats hyperbolic accusations against Republicans so-called "war on women" as they exemplify falsely in the "Republicans not wanting equal pay for women".   I sure hope I am right, and not Mara Liasson, about women's decision making.

Again, this post is not so much an attack on the intelligent Mara Liasson  as on all the Democrats who actually are so demeaning to women to think that they can influence a woman's vote by emotional lies rather than reasoned facts. 

Thank God we don't have long to go to find out as the November elections are just a half a year away.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

What Is Going On With The Rasmussen Reports Polls? [One Year Update - Oct. 21, 2014]

Update: Oct. 21, 2014I started this post exactly one year to the day on Oct. 21, 2013.  Little did I realize that I would still be giving updates a year later and that this post would become the most viewed, by far, of any post published by the Tales.  When I first published this post, "What is going on with the Rasmussen Reports Polls?", one year ago, I was curious but making no accusations, about the strange polling results of the website after the departure of the website's founder, Scott W. Rasmussen.  I really was wondering who took over the poll from Scott and if they had a liberal political agenda because the Rasmussen Reports poll almost immediately became an extreme outlier, to the upside, of the president's approval rating-and it became like that all the time!

Check these amazing stats out:  In this year 2014 until today, there have been 292 polls released by the Rasmussen Reports website [missing some Holiday days] of the presidential approval numbers.  Out of those 292 times, only 8 times has the Rasmussen Reports had the president's approval below 45%.  That means that 284 out of 292 days the Rasmussen Reports presidential approval numbers between 45-52%.  That is an incredible 97.3% of the time.  The reason I say incredible, is because the great Real Clear Politics average of presidential approval numbers during this entire year has had the president's approval at or above 45%, like Rasmussen, 0 times.   Let me be clear on that.  RCP has had the president's approval rating reaching 45% or above zero times, nothing, nada.  For the benefit of Pittsburgh Steeler fans, that is 0%.   

Let me repeat: Rasmussen presidential approval numbers for 2014 have had president Obama's approval numbers above 45%,  97.3% of the time vs. 0% of the time for Real Clear Politics.

Check out their graph from Jan 3, 2014 until today Oct. 20, 2014--where you will see the president's approval for this year has stayed under 45% the entire year [the black line represents the RCP approval of the President's numbers while the red line represents his disapproval numbers]:

As you can see in the RCP graph above, the president's approval numbers in 2014 have never reached the 45% mark, as opposed to the Rasmussen Reports polls which have had the president's approval numbers between 45-52% for 97.3% of the time during this exact same time period.

Also, as bad a year everyone acknowledges that president Obama has had [and more importantly the nation, I might add], the Rasmussen Reports has actually had his approval ratings between 50 and 52% for 32 times this year.  That is mind boggling to me. 

Yes, one year and this post is still going strong, and the Rasmussen Reports continues its wild, extreme outlier status in regards to the Real Clear Politics average of polls.  After one year of unbelievable polling coming out of the Rasmussen Reports web site [I must state again-since the departure of Scott W Rasmussen], I consider their polling, at least as it relates to the presidential approval numbers to be bogus.  You may not.  Tales reports and you decide.
Update: Oct. 14, 2014If any neutral observer just looked at the headlines over the last few weeks they would realize that things seem like they are almost spinning out of control [with ISIS, economy, downturn in the stock market, Ebola, etc.].  With all of that bad news and the fact that the commander-in-chief certainly seems to not be leading or at least it can be said he is leading badly, you would think that the president's disapproval numbers would be very high and his approval rating would be low.  And for almost every poll in the Real Clear Politics average that is true.  Every poll that is except Rasmussen who today, Tuesday, Oct. 14, 2014 has the president's approval rating leaping up to 49% with a disapproval rating of 49%.  So, according to the Rasmussen Reports poll, Obama is back to even water.  What?   Are you kidding me.  Is there anyone out there, even liberals, who actually believe there is a 0 spread between Obama's approval and disapproval numbers?  

Without the Rasmussen Reports numbers in the Real Clear Politics average, the president's approval rating among all the other polls is 41.7% and the disapproval rating of all the other polls is 52.5%.  So, that means, sans Rasmussen, there is an RCP avg spread of negative 10.8 % vs. a 0 approval/disapproval spread from Rasmussen Reports. 

And if you still believe the Rasmussen Reports Polls are legitimate, I have a bridge I want to sell you.
Update: Oct. 6, 2014:  When I had started this Rasmussen Reports poll watch on Oct 21, 2013 [that you can see by scrolling down], little did I know that almost one year later I would still be doing updates of the Rasmussen Reports polls [re: the president's approval rating], as it has continued to show a definite outlier status [and an extreme outlier status except for a brief period between July and August] all this time.  Think about that, an outlier status for almost a year, all to the upside of the president's approval numbers.  This extreme unrealistic outlier status for such a prolonged period has happened since [and almost immediately after] Scott Rasmussen left the Rasmussen Reports web site to start a new company in July of 2013, Rasmussen Media Group, LLC, a digital media firm.

Look at these amazing statistics from an update of my post  "Analysis of Rasmussen Reports Before And After Scott Rasmussen's Departure"  This year from Jan 3, 2014 [the first day Rasmussen reported this year] until today the great Real Clear Politics average of all the polls [even including Rasmussen] of the president's approval rating has been basically between 41-44+ % the entire year, never once having reached as high as 45%.   Check out their graph from Jan 3, 2014 until today Oct. 6, 2014--where you will see the president's approval for this year has stayed under 45% the entire year:

  RCP Presidential Approval Jan 3 2014-Oct. 5, 2014   [black line]         


Now lets compare that to the Rasmussen Reports presidential approval numbers for this entire year.  From their web site, the president has been below 45% this entire year, 8 days.  Yes, I said 8 days out of 277 days which means that the Rasmussen Reports has had the president's approval at or above 45% [between 45-52%] for 269 out of 277 days, which equals 97.1% of the time. 

For the benefit of Dallas Cowboy fans let me repeat those numbers.  The Rasmussen Reports poll has had president Obama's approval rating for the year 2014 at or above 45% for 97.1% of the time, while the Real Clear Politics average of all polls [even including Rasmussen] has had the president's approval rating at or above 45%, 0% of the time. 

The reason I keep saying that the Real Clear Politics average contains the Rasmussen Reports Poll in their average, because the president's approval rating would be even lower for the entire year if it did not have the Rasmussen outlier poll skewing it's average.

As I have stated since the beginning, Tales will continue to watch you Rasmussen Reports and we will report and let the people decide on your legitimacy since Scott Rasmussen left the firm.
Update: Sept. 22, 2014:  I got into a discussion with someone on twitter questioning why I was complaining about the Rasmussen Reports now, since they have always been a dubious polling firm and they were just as bad when Scott Rasmussen was there as they are now.  I doubted that but was curious to look at the numbers to see if that was true.  Please read my analysis in this post I published on another page:  "Analysis of The Rasmussen Reports Before And After Scott Rasmussen's Departure".  Thank you!
Update: Sept. 14, 2014:  I think there should be another billboard up with Scott Rasmussen's picture to echo the one you may have seen showing a picture of George W. Bush saying, "do you miss me now?"  The Rasmussen Reports web site just hasn't been the same [and that may be the understatement of all time] since July of 2013, when Scott left it to found his digital media firm, "Media Group, LLC".  

The ridiculous extreme outlier position compared to all the other polls listed in the great Real Clear Politics web site continues for Rasmussen as on Sunday they actually have Obama's approval rating almost back to level with a 49% approval vs. 50% disapproval.  Are you kidding me Rasmussen Reports?  Real Clear Politics has 8 other polls listed in it's average and every single poll out there has Obama's approval in the lower 40's to high 30's.  The highly respected Gallup poll during the exact same time period Rasmussen does has it's last poll listed [9/11-9/13] has Obama's approval at 41% and disapproval at 54%.  That is a negative 13% spread vs. Rasmussen's negative 1%.  They both can't be accurate-so, which one do you believe?

On Sunday, in Real Clear Politics, the average of polls of the presidents approval and disapproval rating and the spread:

RCP  [with Rasmussen + 8 polls] =  41.6   -53.9  = -12.3%
RCerP [sans Rasmussen, 8 polls] = 40.6   -54.3 =  -13.7%
Update: Sept. 12, 2014:  Well, throw out my optimism [out of hope] that the Rasmussen Reports website has come back to reality in their polling methods.  If they did finally make a slight adjustment in their polling methods for July and August [like I thought], where they weren't an extreme outlier, like they had been the previous 6 months, that seems to be out the window now with their September numbers.  

It's like back to the future, or Deja Vu all over again with Rasmussen's numbers this month.  They are definitely returning to their extreme outlier [in epic proportions] position in relation to all the other polls listed in the great Real Clear Politics web site.

Let me list the following numbers and you see if you  can see which number seems out of place.  [I will give you a big hint by highlighting it.  :-)]: 40, 42, 38, 40, 43, 38, 41, 48    The poll numbers of presidential approval listed, in order were, Gallup ABC News/Washington Post, Fox News, CNN Opinion, Reuters, Economist/ You Gov and drum roll please- Rasmussen.

The Real Clear Politics average spread of every poll of presidential approval vs disapproval numbers including Rasmussen is a negative 13.3%.  Rasmussen's spread, only a negative 3%.

RCP Average: Presidential approval/disapproval: 41.3 - 54.6  = -13.3%

RCerP Average [sans Rasmussen]:  40.3  -  55.1 = -14.8%

All I can conclude is, this is disappointing Rasmussen Reports....very disappointing as you seem to be moving back into bogus territory.  As, usual Tales will be on the watch.
Update: Sept. 4, 2014:  If you have noticed my last few updates of the Rasmussen Reports poll watch, you have seen that I have been encouraged that Rasmussen was coming back into legitimacy with what has surely been a change in polling methodology for the last 2 months.  

I have been trying to give them the benefit of the doubt and I also wanted to make sure that the Tales remains a fair and balanced blog.  They certainly hadn't been a huge unrealistic outlier like they had been the previous 6 months.  That is until today.

So, with some readers urging, I must do this update.  The last two days, with president Obama's rankings falling even farther in the great Real Clear Politics average, they have gone up in approval in Rasmussen to 46% yesterday and 47% today, with only a negative spread of 4%.  What positive presidential action or good news report could have caused this jump?  While Rasmussen has president Obama's approval jumping to 47%, Gallup [in the same exact polling period timeline] has had the president's approval drop to 39% yesterday and 38% today-with a negative spread of 16%.  How is this possible? 

And it is not just Gallup.  The 5 polls listed in the Real Clear Politics average, not counting Rasmussen have the president's approval rating down to one of it's lowest ratings in his presidency.  But not Rasmussen.  I am hoping these last two days have been an anomaly for Rasmussen and they are not returning to their ridiculous huge outlier status compared to the other polls in RCP.

Check these stats out:
Rasmussen Reports presidential approval Sept. 4, 2014: 
Approval 47%  Disapproval 51% = negative 4%

RCP average of presidential approval [6 polls] Sept. 4:  
Approval 41.7%  Disapproval 52.7% = negative 11%

RCerP average [sans Rasmussen-5 polls] Sept. 4, 2014:  
Approval 40.8%  Disapproval 53% = negative 12.2%

Tales is watching you Rasmussen!  :-)
Update: August 22, 2014:  While the Rasmussen Reports presidential poll has still been an outlier to the plus regarding the president's approval numbers, they have not been an extreme outlier [like they had been] for almost 2 months now.  It was June 30, 2014 the last time Rasmussen has had Obama's approval up to 49% or greater, like the many times they did the previous 6+ months.  Now instead of their positive to negative approval ratings being 8-12+ points greater than the Real Clear Politics average almost every day since I began this Rasmussen poll watch on October 21, 2013, they have come down to within about [only] 3-5 points higher since the beginning of July.  That is within reason. 

I submit, they must have made an adjustment to their polling methodology that has brought them within shouting distance of all the other polls out there. 

Yes, they are still showing slightly higher approval numbers for president Obama, but their results have become more realistic compared with the other polls in RCP.  For example, today the Rasmussen Reports has Obama's approval at 45% compared to the RCP average of 42% and their spread of negative 8% compares favorably to the RCP average of negative 10%.

Note-update:  On Sunday, August 24, the Rasmussen Reports has president Obama's approval down to 43% and the spread is negative 13%.  Not an outlier at all.  Along with the last 7 weeks in polling, this convinces me that the Rasmussen Reports poll website has definitely made an adjustment in their methodolgy of polling and they can once again be included in the family of legitimate pollsters. 

Therefore, I must confess that RCP has shown more wisdom in keeping them in their list of polls and not taking them out like I have suggested many times.  I apologize, RCP, you were right.

While not giving the Rasmussen Reports "Tales" seal of approval just yet, we are encouraged that their extreme outlier status [hopefully] has become a thing of the past.  But don't think Tales won't be watching you Rasmussen Reports.  :-)
Update: July 26, 2014For the the first time since I have started this Rasmussen Reports poll watch 9 months ago, I may be detecting an adjustment in the Rasmussen Reports polling methodology, an adjustment that has inched them closer to legitimacy in the last 24 days.  Yes, they still [until today] have been a slight outlier to the upside compared to the other polls in the great Real Clear Politics list of polls, but they have not been outrageously so, as they have been since the beginning of this poll watch.  Today, Saturday July 26, 2014 they are not an outlier at all as they have Obama's approval down to 44% and disapproval at 54% for a - 10% spread.  The RCP average today [before Gallup new numbers on Saturday] is 41.7% approval with a negative 11.7% spread.  So, Rasmussen is close to the RCP average and I would say for today at least, not an outlier.

The last time Rasmussen has had the president's approval down to 44% was on February 13, 2014.  Even more telling that there might have been an adjustment made for the better regarding the Rasmussen Reports polling methodology is that for almost 4 weeks Rasmussen Reports has had Obama's approval up to 48% only twice and they have not had his approval above 48% since June 30, 2014.  The last time Rasmussen Reports has had Obama's approval up to 50% was on June 9, 2014.

So, while we are not ready to declare this Rasmussen Reports poll watch moot, we are getting encouraging signs.  Tales would like to see another month of non-extreme outlier status of Rasmussen Reports polling before we can shout Hallelujah. :-)
Update: July 14, 2014:  To be fair and balanced on this Rasmussen Reports watch, I must report that for the longest stretch this year 2014, the Rasmussen Reports has not been an extreme outlier.  Yes, they have still been an outlier to the upside of the president's approval rating but not wildly so [for almost 2 weeks].  For the last 9 readings Rasmussen has had Obama's approval rating at 45 or 46%.  The last time Obama's approval was 47% or higher in the Rasmussen Reports was on July 2.  While the Rasmussen approval of the president is still 5% higher than the RCP average, and their spread of approval vs disapproval is still 5% more positive for the president, at least they are within shouting range.  We will see if this trend continues, which might mean Rasmussen has adjusted their methodology so as not to be such a huge, irrational outlier with respect to the other polls, or if this is a temporary anomaly.  

You can be sure, Tales will be on the watch. 
Update: June 30, 2014Well, that didn't take long.  In the last Rasmussen Reports update Tales reported that for 3 straight days Rasmussen had Obama's job approval at 45% and its negative rating of -8 and -9%, which for those 3 days meant it was not a huge outlier like it has been for 8 months [since Scott Rasmussen left the polling firm].  Now just 5 days later with certainly no positive news coming out on the president's behalf, in fact, much negative news having occurred, Rasmussen amazingly has Obama's job approval leaping back up to 49% with a disapproval of only 50%.  We didn't even get one week of reasonable poll numbers out of Rasmussen [compared to every single other poll listed in the great Real Clear Politics].  Let's put this in perspective.  The Real Clear Politics average of every poll listed without Rasmussen  has Obama's approval at 40.7% and a disapproval of 54.1% which equals to a negative 13.4% ratingRasmussen has Obama's approval at 49% and a negative 1% rating.  Would you consider that an outlier, or, after 8 straight months of similar results, evidence of a bogus polling firm?  Tales reports, you decide.
Update: June 25, 2014In what I hope is not an anomaly for the Rasmussen Reports, but it probably is, for the first time in 38 days [and for one of the very few times in the last 8 months] the Rasmussen Reports does not have president Obama's approval rating above 45%.  It is exactly 45% approval vs 54% disapproval.  That negative 9% rating from the Rasmussen Reports is the first time it has been this low on their web sight in 72 days, on April 14, 2014.  In the past whenever, every once in a while, Rasmussen Reports has had a reasonable polling result, at least not an extreme outlier, it is quickly followed in a couple of days back to their extreme, outrageous outlier status.  We shall be on the watch.  

One thing I think this number today points out, that the president must really be in bad shape, polling wise, if even Rasmussen has them at negative 9% and not in the upper 40's.  I guess that could be one of the arguments Real Clear Politics might give for not dropping them yet [like we have called for], so then a number like today highlights even more clearly the president's problems.

Tales will remain on the Rasmussen watch, reporting the truth wherever it leads.  :-)

Update of update:  today it is Friday June 27, 2014 and for the third straight day Rasmussen has had Obama's approval number at 45% with a negative 8% approval vs disapproval rating.  These last 3 days of not being extreme outlier results do not erase 8 months of incredulous poll numbers by the Rasmussen Reports - so, Tales will remain vigilant.
Update: June 22, 2014:  I started this Rasmussen Reports Poll watch on October 21, 2013, when I noticed some curious poll numbers coming from the Rasmussen Reports since Scott Rasmussen left the polling firm almost a year ago.  Since then I have received much support thanking me for this post from many others who have also noticed the extreme outlier status of Rasmussen in favor of President Obama's approval numbers.  For example, just yesterday, Sunday, June 22, I received the following e-mail from a Scott B., forwarded to me of an e-mail he sent to, that I wanted to share with you:

"So today you have Obama's approval/disapproval at 49/50; a minus 1 in net disapproval. The Real Clear Politics average is minus 12 in net disapproval. Your national polling is pathetic. Your national polling has been a Daily Outlier since Scott Rasmussen departed.

How do you justify your existence? Please disclose how many subscribers you have lost since Scott Rasmussen left because of your daily garbage data dump. To believe your polling, you would have to believe that with all his recent scandals and failures,
Obama's approval has stayed static with a small rise. I live on the planet earth in the USA. I have no idea where your data comes from, but it is not from this universe!"                 Regards, Scott

Good e-mail to Rasmussen Reports, Scott.  Thanks, for sharing.

Updating stats on Sunday June 22, 2014: for the last 244 days [since Oct. 21, 2013] the Rasmussen Reports has had president Obama's approval above 45%, 198 times vs. the RCP average of all polls [including Rasmussen] which has had Obama's approval above 45%, 1 time [and that 1 time it was 45.1%].

Real Clear Politics average from Sunday June 22, 2014:
Approve 42.2 %    Disapprove  53.8 %  =  - 11.6%

Real Clearer Politics [sans Rasmussen] from June 22, 2014:
Approve 40.8 %    Disapprove  54.6 %  =  - 13.8%
Update: June 18, 2014:   For those new to these updates, I ask if you will please scroll down to my original post on Oct. 21, 2013 to understand what I am trying to show with this post, that since Scott Rasmussen left the Rasmussen Reports polling firm there has been, not just a bias in their polls, but comparing their poll numbers to everyone else in Real Clear Politics  [the gold standard of polls] an almost certain bogus nature to their polling results.  For example, let's look at these Obama's approval numbers in the month of June from the polls listed in RCP and see if one stands out [I will give you a hint by highlighting  :-)]: 40 - 40 - 38 - 43 - 42 - 41 - 41 - 48  Respectively, these are numbers listed currently in RCP of Fox News - Reuters/Ispos - Bloomberg - Economist - Gallup - NBC/Wall Street Journal - and Rasmussen.

Since Oct. 21, 2013 [240 days ago] when I started this Rasmussen watch, I can also update these numbers:  Rasmussen has had Obama's approval at or above 50% = 38 times.   RCP = 0 times.
Rasmussen has had Obama's approval above 45% = 194 times vs. RCP average = 1 time [and the only reason it was one time 45.1% on Oct. 24, 2013 was because Rasmussen put it above-without Rasmussen included in the average, it would have also been 0 times].

RCP average today:
Obama approval 42.3%  Disapproval 53.6%  =  - 11.3%

RCerP average [that does not include Rasmussen poll]:
Obama approval 41.6%  Disapproval 54.0%  =  - 12.4%
Update: June 5, 2014: I am sorry to have a third straight day of updates, but the Rasmussen [less] strange poll numbers are getting more ridiculous, even by their standards.  I try to do an update about once every two or three weeks, but this polling firm is getting out of hand.

With all that is going on in the world and economically in America and with recent scandals that have plagued this president, what would you think of someone who tried to tell you that Barack Obama's approval rating as president is higher now than even when he got re-elected in 2012?  Yes, I would think the same thing: "Who let them out?"  

Well, that is what the Rasmussen Reports poll is conveying as somehow, their polling is showing the president's approval rating at 52% and disapproval at 46%, a +6% spread.  President Obama won re-election over Mitt Romney by a 51-48% margin.  And the Rasmussen numbers almost matches what the president won election by in 2008 as Obama beat McCain by 53-46%.  Does anyone, even the most ardent liberal Democrat [not counting the Rasmussen Reports people] really believe that Obama is back up or even close to those numbers?

This now means that since I have started this Rasmussen watch back in October 21, 2013, 227 days ago, Rasmussen Reports has had president Obama's approval at or above 50%, 36 times vs 0 times for RCP.   And the Rasmussen Reports has had Obama's approval above 45%, 181 times vs 1 time for RCP.   

Rasmussen Reports an outlier?  No, much more than an outlier.  I submit they have established themselves as a totally bogus polling firm since the great Scott Rasmussen left the firm.

Some may ask why do I keep harping on this since it is only one outlier poll and RCP gives their average with many more polls that would dilute the outlier status of the Rasmussen numbers.  The reason is because they are such a wild outlier, and have been for going into their 8th month now, that they can actually skew the RCP average in a pretty big way.  For example, today, Thursday:

Real Clear Politics [RCP] that includes Rasmussen:
President job approval average 43.4 disapproval 52.4 = - 9.0%

Real Clearer Politics [RCerP] that doesn't include Rasmussen:
President job approval average  42.1 disapproval 53.3 = - 11.2%
June 4th update I'll just give today's Rasmussen Reports numbers with one comment. [then please read the June 3 update from yesterday, and if you haven't yet the original post from Oct. 21, 2013]. Thank you.

Rasmussen [less] Reports:Obama Approval 52%- Disapproval 47%

Comment: Why, oh why, great Real Clear Politics do you continue to list in your job approval numbers of the President such an undisputed, every day outlier poll, and what I and many others believe is an obvious illegitimate poll?
Update: June 3, 2014So, as not to be repetitive on every Rasmussen Reports update, please read the first sentence of the May 27, 2014 update.  Well President Obama is going through another uncomfortable period in his presidency with the VA scandal and now his ill advised terrorist exchange and photo op with the pro Taliban dad of the deserter.  Well, I guess the president's approval rating is down.  And yes it is with CNN, Gallup, CBS News, Associated Press, Reuters, and ABC News/Washington Post with an average negative spread of those 6 polling organizations at - 10.8% ... and then there is the Rasmussen Reports poll. Yes, somehow they are catching a different mood of the country regarding the president's approval vs disapproval rating in their poll.  They incredibly once again have the president in positive territory at + 1%  =  50% approve and 49% disapprove.  So, either Rasmussen is right or every single other poll out there is right.  
Keeping the tally from October 21, 2013, when I started my Rasmussen Reports Poll watch [since Scott Rasmussen left the polling firm and taken over by God knows who], try to digest the following stats: In the last 225 days, Rasmussen Reports has had Obama's approval rating at or above 50%, 34 times -- RCP at or above 50%, 0 times.  In the last 225 days, Rasmussen Reports has had Obama's approval above 45% an astounding 179 times -- RCP [even including Rasmussen in their list] has had Obama's approval above 45%, 1 time.  

In case you missed that, let me repeat those or above 50%, 34 times vs. 0 times and above 45%, 179 times vs. 1 time.  

Is the Rasmussen Reports poll bogus?  Tales reports, you decide ... the obvious.

PollDate        Approve Disapprove Spread
RCP Average5/16 - 6/2
43.652.7 -9.1
CNN/Opinion Research5/29 - 6/1
4355 -12
ABC News/Wash Post5/29 - 6/1
4553 -8
Gallup5/31 - 6/2
4352 -9
Rasmussen Reports5/31 - 6/2

5049 +1
Reuters/Ipsos5/22 - 5/26
3856 -18
Associated Press/GfK5/16 - 5/19
4356 -13
CBS News5/16 - 5/19
4348 -5

Note: I think you know how I stand on whether I think Rasmussen Reports has become a bogus polling firm since Scott Rasmussen left as I like to call it the "Rasmussenless Reports".  But on twitter from twitter friend Dillon @000Dillon000 has come up with an even more appropriate name for the new Rasmussen [minus Scott Rasmussen] Reports  - the "Obamamussen Reports"
Update: May 27, 2014This is ground hog day all over again as far as the record breaking outlier status [to the upside of the president's approval status] of the Rasmussen Reports Poll [since the great Scott Rasmussen left the firm about 9 months ago].  As I am updating this on Tuesday May 27, 2014, Rasmussen once again is alone in having Obama's approval rating in positive territory: 50% approval - 49% disapproval.  This compares, as it usually does, in an outlier status to the RCP compilation of polls average, which has Obama's approval at only 44% and a negative 8.1% [approval vs. disapproval]. 

Also, since my update of May 14, 2014 I can update the number of times Rasmussen has had Obama's approval at or above 50% since I started my Rasmussen watch on Oct. 21, 2013-218 days ago.  Rasmussen Reports has had Obama at or above 50% - 33 times in the last 7 months.  RCP - 0 times.  Even more stark is to look at how many times Rasmussen vs RCP has had Obama's approval above 45%.  The Rasmussen Reports in the last 218 days has had Obama's approval above 45% an incredible 172 times.  RCP has had Obama's approval above 45 % - 1 time.  1 as in once!  

To realize how bogus the Rasmussen Reports Poll of the president's job approval number has become: The liberal Democrats don't even quote it to show how Barack Obama is riding high in approval ratings.  When even the Democrats realize how bogus Rasmussen has become, that is something. 

Update: May 21, 2014: If one looked at the Real Clear Politics average of polls, you might think Obama's approval is in the doldrums with a 44.1 % approval average and a negative 7.5% rating of approval vs disapproval numbers.  But if one just looked at the Rasmussen Reports website poll numbers, you would think president Obama is flying high.  Yes, once again [check the May 14, 2014 update] the Rasmussen Reports has Obama in positive approval with the American people: 50% approval - 48 % disapproval. If I didn't know better, I would think Rasmussen Reports was trying to break the Guinness Book of World Records in longest length of time in outlier poll status.  If you scroll down to my original post on October 21, 2013, you will realize that Rasmussen is now well into its 7th month of outlier status [to the upside] regarding the president's approval numbers.  The reason I keep pointing this out is, while it is just one poll, it really skews the RCP average [and always in one way].  For example, today [I am posting this before Gallup numbers have come in] RCP has Obama's approval at 44.1% with a negative 7.5% [approval vs disapproval].  If RCP didn't include the Rasmussen Reports poll, Obama's approval would drop to 43.3% with a negative 8.9% rating.

Please also read the May 14, 2014 update and then my original post on October 21, 2013 for some context.  In the original post you will find I have noticed this outlier status occurring since Scott Rasmussen left the polling firm to start a new digital media organization.  The reason I bring that up is some don't know that Scott Rasmussen is no longer with the Rasmussen Reports Poll website [and hasn't been for about 9 months] and they think I am criticizing Scott Rasmussen, which is exactly opposite of what I am doing.  Thanks!
Update: May 14, 2014: For the third straight day Rasmussen has now had president Obama's approval rating at the 50% mark. So, I decided to do a study from the day I started this Rasmussen watch Oct. 21, 2013, until today, May 14, 2014 [205 days] to see how many times Rasmussen has had the president's approval at or above 50% and how many times the gold standard of polls, Real Clear Politics has had the president's approval at or above 50%. Rasmussen has had Obama's approval at or above 50%, since Oct. 21, 2013, 29 times.  The RCP average of polls has had the president's approval at or above 50%, 0 times.  

But it gets even worse, much worse.  Not only hasn't RCP ever had the president's approval up to 50% in the last 7 months, the highest that they have had Obama's approval rating is 45.1% which happened on Oct. 24, 2013.  Other than that one time, the RCP average of presidential approval has ranged between 39.8% and 45%.  So, with RCP having Obama's rating above 45% 1 day in the last 7 months, I decided to see how many days Rasmussen has had Obama's approval above 45%.  The answer = 160 times. Let me repeat that, Rasmussen had Obama over 45% 160 times vs. the RCP average of polls 1 time in the last 7 months [and remember the RCP poll includes in their average the Rasmussen poll which skews their average-so, you can surmise it is even worse than it looks.]  

Let's put these statistics another way.  In the last 7 months [Oct. 21, 2013-May 14, 2014] the RCP average of all polls has had president Obama's approval rating between 40-45%, 99.6% of the time.  In the exact same time period, Rasmussen has had president Obama's approval rating between 46-52% 78% of the time.  

If those numbers don't prove the bogus nature of the Rasmussen poll regarding presidential approval numbers, nothing will. Which leads to the obvious question: Why does Real Clear Politics continue to include Rasmussen [at least as far as the presidential approval numbers go] in their list of polls?  
Update: May 7, 2014: Please read, for background information, yesterday's update from May 6, 2014 and scroll down to original post from Oct. 21, 2013 when this Rasmussen poll watch first started.  Today the Rasmussen Reports once again has president Obama's approval rating in positive territory, and this bogus polling firm has been the only one that not just today but numerous times the last 6 months has had Obama's approval rating in positive territory.  Today Rasmussen: Obama approval 50% Disapproval at 48% = +2%, while the RCP average is at -7.1%.
Note: without bogus Rasmussen numbers in the RCP average, Obama's approval/disapproval number would be -8.3%.   
Update: May 6, 2014: Well, if you check my update from April 25, 2014 I was hoping beyond hope that Rasmussen would show more than a two or three day brief entrance into normalcy with the other polls out there.  I was wrong once again and now I vow never to post an update of the Rasmussen Poll getting back to a legitimate polling status [compared to the other polls] until I see at least a couple or 3 straight weeks of normalcy [and not its usual outlier status-always to the upside of president Obama's job approval numbers].  In other words, I won't be fooled again as I was [maybe out of wishful thinking] in my Feb. 13 and April 25 updates.  Today, once again Rasmussen has Obama back to even approval numbers, 49+ and 49-, outside of every other legitimate pollster.  The RCP average has president Obama at -7.6% even including the outlier bogus Rasmussen polling firm.  What is even more disturbing, Rasmussen outlier status is creeping into its generic ballot [but I am yet to claim that officially, like I have their president's job approval numbers].  While the RCP average has the Republicans up +0.6, Rasmussen has the Democrats up +4.  I hope that doesn't become a trend with Rasmussen like their wild outlier status of president's job approval.  Here is the RCP average from the Real Clear Politics great political web site:

RCP Average
4/11 - 5/5
5/3 - 5/5
5/2 - 5/4
5/2 - 5/4
4/26 - 4/28
4/24 - 4/27
4/23 - 4/27
4/23 - 4/27
4/13 - 4/15
4/11 - 4/15


Update: April 25, 2014: In these Rasmussen updates, which have turned into a Rasmussen poll watch from the original post in October of 2013 [scroll down], we are trying to not just show when Rasmussen has been such a huge outlier [which has been most of the time for over 6 months], but we are trying to be accurate and post those times when the Rasmussen poll on the president's approval rating are not a huge outlier.  There have been two or three other times when Rasmussen has not been a huge outlier, and in all those times they lasted exactly three days-then went back to their big outlier status.  Today, for the second straight day, Rasmussen is not only not a huge outlier, it is not an outlier at all.  In both the last two days Rasmussen has a 45-54% approval rating for the president [a negative 9% difference].  That is right in line with the RCP average of 43.7% approval and a negative 8.5% spread.  I am kind of reluctant to post this update because every other time Rasmussen shows they might getting in line with the rest of the polling and out of their outlier status, they will have a huge leap in one day of the president's approval rating.  So, it wouldn't surprise me if tomorrow Rasmussen goes from 45-54  to 50-49 and back to their outlier status they have been for 6+ months.  That big of swing in one day has happened before.  But you can be sure the Tales will be watching and reporting.   :-)  
Update: April 11, 2014For the third straight day, every poll listed in the great Real Clear Politics average of polls has president Obama's approval rating at between 40 and 43% [every poll out of the eight listed except Rasmussen].  Rasmussen for the third straight day has president Obama's approval at 50% in positive territory +1%.  Either every other pollster out there is wrong or Rasmussen is wrong.  We report, you decide.  

I have been doing this Rasmussen watch since October of last year. Rather than repeat every point I have been trying to make for the last 6 months, will you please scroll down to my original post on October 21, 2013.  Needless to say I consider Rasmussen [at least in regards to the presidential approval numbers] to be a total joke.  But, what do I know. 
Update: April 3, 2014: I received in my e-mail yesterday a well written statement from a Scott Brown that was sent to the Rasmussen Reports about an explanation they gave for questions they received about their polling.  If you check my post from Feb. 24, 2014 near the bottom, I echoed those exact same concerns about their meaningless explanation [that did not deal at all with their constant outlier status - an outlier status from the other polls that is always showing a higher number in president Obama's approval than the other polls.  There is not one instance [not one instance] in the last 6 months where they have been an outlier having a lower number for president Obama then the other polls.  For that to happen for six months seems an improbable statistic for a legitimate polling organization.  Plus this phenomena has only occurred after Scott Rasmussen left the organization to form a new company.  Coincidence...not over 6 months worth, no way.  

Scott Brown, gave me permission to post his e-mail in this update that he sent yesterday to

"Good try today in your polling explanation. No cigar though. Not even close. 

Your polling is not being criticized for its daily fluctuations, but for being 5-10 points off on a daily basis in favor of the Democrats and Obama."
Update: March 25, 2014: To continue the Tales watch of the Rasmussen Reports Polls since Scott Rasmussen left to start a new company, there may [and I emphasize the word may] be encouraging news that Rasmussen has got there act together to not be so much of an outlier as they have been for the last 6 months.  Now for the third straight day, while they have still had president Obama's approval numbers higher than the other polls in Real Clear Politics, at least they are not a wild outlier as they have been since Scott Rasmussen's departure and new people took over the "Reports".  For the second straight day their poll has president Obama at 46% approval and 52% disapproval.  While that is higher than the other polls that have president Obama's approval numbers in the low 40% range, it is at least within shouting range- so I do not consider this a big outlier.  Of course the last time I reported a 3 day encouraging news from their poll, the very next day they had an unbelievable one day turn of Obama gaining 5% in approval and 5% lowering of disapproval for a 10% change in approval vs. disapproval range [with no major news event that could account for such an unrealistic change].  So, Tales will be watching these next couple of weeks to see if Rasmussen goes back to their unrealistic outlier staus, or returns to being considered a legitimate polling organization.   Here are the numbers from today [Thursday 3/27] that I consider are hopeful numbers from Rasmussen [hopeful as I really do want them to become legitimate again]:

RCP Average3/14 - 3/26--42.653.4 -10.8
FOX News3/23 - 3/251015 RV4053 -13
The Economist/YouGov3/22 - 3/24711 RV4453 -9
Associated Press/GfK3/20 - 3/241012 A4159 -18
Rasmussen Reports3/24 - 3/261500 LV4652 -6
Gallup3/23 - 3/251500 A4252 -10
CBS News3/20 - 3/231097 A4350 -7
GWU/Battleground3/16 - 3/201000 LV4453 -9
Reuters/Ipsos3/14 - 3/181165 RV4155 -14

Update: Feb.24, 2014:
I first did this post, "What is going on with the Rasmussen Reports Poll" on October 21, 2013.  I did not start this post after only one or two odd results.  I had been watching it for more than a month of odd results that I had seen.  My first post never questioned the legitimacy of their poll [after Scott Rasmussen left the organization] but it was an actual honest elicitation of information of why were we seeing an outlier status in approval of the president's ratings from Rasmussen in relation to the other polls in Real Clear Politics [that was not there when Scott Rasmussen was president of the company].  So, now as we are closing in on a half a year of outlandish outlier status [with one short 3 day period that I noted in my Feb. 13 update, that was within the norm of the RCP average] I now consider the Rasmussen Reports Poll to be totally bogus, with a liberal agenda to advance.  Today, Feb. 14, while the RCP average [even including Rasmussen] has the president at -7.5%, Rasmussen has the president's approval rating almost back to his re-election number at 52% and a +5% rating [just about what he won the election by].  I think Rasmussen Reports have given themselves away with their explanation on their site: "Some readers wonder how we come up with our job approval ratings for the president since they often don’t show as dramatic a change as some other pollsters do. It depends on how you ask the question and whom you ask".   No, Rasmussen Reports, that is not what the people are wondering.  We are not wondering why your ratings are constant.  The question the people are wondering is why they are consistently such an outlier result with every other pollster out there, and consistently between 7-14% higher president's approval rating then from the RCP average of polls.  Then Rasmussen gave the reason that there poll is different from the other polls is because it depends on who you ask the questions to and how you ask the questions.  Well, now we know.  Thank you Rasmussen as you have just admitted you are asking the people you want, and the questions you want, to elicit the bogus poll numbers you want.  That has to be the only credible explanation of their questionable poll results always favoring the president over the other polls.   

To me there is no longer a question in my mind of the legitimacy [or I should say illegitimacy] of the Rasmussen Reports poll. The only question that remains is why the greatly respected web site Real Clear Politics [that I love and check every day] is still carrying their poll that skews their average by as much as 3% points. 

Update: Feb. 14, 2014:  Everything you see I wrote in the update of Feb. 13, yesterday, disregard that.  I take back everything I said, even more so, after seeing what has to be to a legitimate pollster statistically impossible, absent some major event occurring.  For three straight days the Rasmussen Reports poll had Obama's approval at 44% and disapproval at 55%.  That meant for three straight days [and the only three days] in the last 5 months that they weren't an outlier poll.  So, I foolishly was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt thinking three days might wipe out so many months of outlier status [not just outlier-but huge outlier status].  Well, today in one day the president's approval in the Rasmussen Poll jumped 5 points to 49% with the disapproval dropping 5 points to 50%.  From a -11%  to a -1% IN ONE DAY with no major event happening or major speech or major positive news on the economic front in the United States or the world and Rasmussen has Obama gaining 10 points in the negativity rating.  To me, that even amplifies the bogus methodology Rasmussen has to be using and puts them clearly in the Zogby bogus status from years ago when they were dropped from the Real Clear Politics average.  I made a mistake in posting yesterday's positive report on Rasmussen, but I won't be fooled again. 
Update: Feb. 13, 2014For almost 6 months this blog has been on a Rasmussen Reports poll watch following the amazing turn of Rasmussen being a respected poll, when Scott Rasmussen headed the organization, into an outlier of almost biblical proportions in which the president's poll numbers were elevated by 7-10 points daily from every other poll that was out there and certainly elevated that much from the highly respected daily RCP average of polls.  You could tell how much Rasmussen had fallen in respectability, when not even the liberal Democrats were quoting this poll that had the president near are above 50% while the other polls were showing him near or under 40%.

So, it must be noted, today for the third straight day the Rasmussen Reports poll has been back in with the mainstream of all the other polls [with the president's approval rating at 44% positive and 55% negative].   While three days does not wipe out 6 months of outlier status, it does give me hope that Rasmussen can now once again be in the respected poll status.  

It is hard to understand how this has happened, if they had changed their method that was used when Scott Rasmussen was there and are now changing back because of their outlier status, but something has happened these last 3 days with their polling that didn't show up for many months.  Whatever has happened it is a positive development.

Tales, which has constantly been updating the outlier status of the Rasmussen poll, would be intellectually dishonest if we hadn't also reported on this positive development of the Rasmussen Reports poll.  Tales also must give kudos to Real Clear Politics.  I had been wondering why they were keeping the Rasmussen Reports poll in its daily average of polls which had wildly skewed the number.  But now, I can see the value in their doing that because by remaining in the average of their polls we are also able to notice this hopeful turnaround of Rasmussen back into the mainstream of polls.   Thank you Real Clear Politics for not following the Tales advice.  :-)
Update on January 16, 2014:  It gets worse and worse and worse.  Today, Thursday January 16, while every other polling firm has Obama way down in popularity, near or below the 40% approval rating, Rasmussen Reports has Obama at 51% approval and 47% disapproval.  Gallup, during the exact same time frame has Obama's approval at 39%.  Even more mind boggling to me than the obvious bogus nature of the new Rasmussen Reports [since Scott Rasmussen left the organization] is why the greatly respected [and one of my favorite web sites] Real Clear Politics continues to carry them in their list of polls, which skews the numbers.  If Rasmussen Reports came out tomorrow with Obama at an 80% approval rating would RCP put that in their numbers??

Update on January 7, 2014: I made a statement on my original post on October 21, 2013 that I was not accusing the Rasmussen Reports of being taken over by some left wing Democrats.  I'd like to now amend that statement.  Unless shown otherwise, I must assume that some liberal Democrats were the ones who took over the Rasmussen Reports web site from Scott Rasmussen when he left to to found a new group.  

Not only has the outlier status of Rasmussen in favoring the president in his approval rate continued for months, it has now become a joke to even call this an outlier poll.   I think bogus would be a better word for it.  In today's RCP average of all the polls [including the Rasmussen] the extreme outlier position of Rasmussen is magnified.

Approve Disapprove Spread
RCP Average12/3 - 1/6
   42.5    53.6 -11.1
Rasmussen Reports1/4 - 1/6      49      49  tie

Even with the inclusion of the Rasmussen Poll skewing the results, there is a spread of approval rating for the president of a negative 11.1% with Obama's approval rating of 42.5%.   The Rasmussen joke, errrr poll, has president Obama's approval rating at 49% with a tie in the spread.  You're kidding me.   And if you check out the latest 7 polls, excluding Rasmussen from the RCP averages, the difference between all those 7 other polls and Rasmussen becomes even more stark.  Those show Obama with a 41.4% Approval with a 55.4% disapproval for a negative 14.0% spread, compared to Rasmussen having it even.  You've heard the song "more than a woman" from the Bee Gees.  There should be a song about the Rasmussen polls, "More than an outlier."
__________________________________________ Original post from Oct. 21, 2013: What is Going On With The Rasmussen Reports Poll:

Scott Rasmussen
For many of us political junkies, we like to follow the political opinion polls to gauge the mood of the country.   Two of the polls that I check regularly are the Rasmussen Reports polls and the Gallup opinion polls because both of those are updated daily. 

In the past, the Rasmussen Reports poll [I think unfairly] was perceived by most on the left to be skewed to favor Republicans.  In 2010 Nate Silver did an analysis of the different polling firms and in his opinion he found the Rasmussen Reports [headed by Scott Rasmussen] to be biased [skewed toward Republicans] and inaccurate.  I must admit, being a conservative Republican, I did go to the Rasmussen Reports web site first because it did seem like out of all the polls, their results would be more favorable to Republicans.  I just assumed, maybe out of hope, that they were the most accurate.  That seemed true up until these last couple of months after Mr. Rasmussen decided to leave his post as head of the Rasmussen Reports web site.

In July 2013, Scott Rasmussen left his post to found Rasmussen Media Group, LLC, a digital media firm whose stated mission is to "refine, enlarge, and empower the voice of mainstream America."

Rasmussen Reports say they have kept the same methodology since Scott left in order to preserve the legacy of the web site, but the results of their polls these last few weeks seemed to suggest something different.  While in the past if the Rasmussen polls were an outlier, they were almost always an outlier favored more to the Republican side compared to the other polls [for the most part-of course, not every time].   But if you have checked the Rasmussen Reports polls these last few weeks compared to the other opinion polls, and to the average of all the polls as noted in Real Clear Politics, they have been an outlier, but this time they have been an outlier favoring the president.    It would be one thing if their polls just showed a rise in the president's popularity that went along with all of the other polls, but that is not the case.  They have had president Obama's favorability rating at 50 and 51% many times these last few weeks, when no other polls have had him that high.  Their recent polls have been an outlier, favorable to the president by between 5-7% of the Real Clear Politics average of polls.  For example, as I am writing this post on Sunday, check out this average of polls from Real Clear Politics:

PollDateSampleApprove Disapprove Spread
RCP Average10/1 - 10/18--43.751.2 -7.5
Gallup10/16 - 10/181500 A4251 -9
Rasmussen Reports10/16 - 10/181500 LV5050Tie
The Economist/YouGov10/12 - 10/14691 RV4256 -14
Pew Research10/9 - 10/131504 A4351 -8
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl10/7 - 10/9800 A4748 -1
Democracy Corps (D)10/6 - 10/8860 LV4749 -2
Reuters/Ipsos10/4 - 10/81300 A4054 -14
Associated Press/GfK10/3 - 10/71227 A3753 -16
FOX News10/1 - 10/2952 RV4549 -4

As you see in the average of all the polls, the president has a 43.7%  approval rating with a negative 7.5% spread [i.e., approval vs disapproval].    But the Rasmussen Reports poll showed the president with a 50% approval rating and a tie in the spread.  That is a big outlier in favor of the president and it has been like this for weeks now.

I am not accusing the Rasmussen Reports of being taken over by some liberal Democrats trying to skew the results in favor of the president, but I am really curious as to why, since Scott Rasmussen has left the Rasmussen Reports, the polls seem to have been an outlier in favor of the president, when in the past, if  they were an outlier, they were an outlier that seemed to disfavor the president.

pollster guru Nate Silver
Maybe, it is possible, that this is just a coincidence, but it still seems like a curious coincidence to me.  I wish someone with a lot more expertise in polls and methodology than me, like Nate Silver or someone like him, would do a comparative analysis of the Rasmussen Reports between the time of Scott Rasmussen's tenure to the time he has left the Rasmussen Reports.

Hmm, now that the Rasmussen Reports polls seem more favorable to the president, I wonder if Nate Silver would still label them as biased and inaccurate?