Thursday, February 24, 2011

Mitch Daniels explains himself

Yesterday I posted this on my blog blasting Mitch Daniels: Are there any issues Republicans should stand for Mitch?
I may have  flown off the handle so fast because I have admired Daniels so much in the past,  and his initial comments were such a letdown.
Daniels seems to have gotten the message [i.e., heat from conservatives] as he clarifies his remarks that he made yesterday. Because I have really liked Daniels in the past as a staunch conservative on fiscal matters, I will give him a second chance.  Also, I have been informed [but have not been confirmed yet] that he is not against the GOP's attempts at a right to work law just that he felt school choice should have been first on the list of reform changes.
So, Mitch I will give you a second chance with this stipulation: we are watching you, and don't make  anti conservative comments again that you need to clarify.    :-)


Hat tip: Jim Geraghty from his "Campaign Spot" on National Review Online
Daniels’ latest remarks from this afternoon:
GOVERNOR DANIELS:  First, I need to clarify a confusion I personally caused yesterday. I didn’t realize it at the time; most of you were not confused; yesterday I began extemporaneous comments by saying that the activities of the last two days- and I think I gestured to the atrium- were entirely appropriate. I was talking about the protestors and those who came to express their views and the strength of those views. They are welcome here, today and every day. What they’ve done is completely appropriate. It was not to condone the activities of the house Democratic caucus; which is completely unacceptable of course. Rereading my own comments, I could see how they could have been misconstrued and a couple of people did. So just for those of you who did misunderstand, my bad, but I don’t want any question left.  Huge distinction between people exercising their first amendment rights and people who take a public paycheck, walk off the job, go to another state, and try to wreck the democratic process.
The House Democrats have shown a complete contempt for the democratic process. The way that works—as we all learned in grade school—is that if you seek public office you come do your duty, you argue, you debate, you amend if you can, you vote “no” if you feel you should.  If you are not successful, you go home and take your case to the voters.  You don’t walk off the job, take your public paycheck with you, and attempt to bring the whole process to a screeching halt. You know if they persist, the Democratic Party of Indiana will need a rebranding effort because this is as anti-democratic as behavior can be. 
All that said, I think they deserve another chance, let the heat of the moment cool I hope.  Maybe if their leadership doesn’t have a conscience about the unconscionable things they’ve done, maybe individuals members do.  But I do hope that having made their point; scoring one victory on the big issue, they will decide to come back to work. Let’s do the people’s business, together.  I can tell you that I don’t know what will happen; I don’t know how we’ll proceed.  I can tell you what won’t happen, we will not be bullied or blackmailed out of pursuing the agenda we laid in front of the people of Indiana, that agenda is going to get voted on.  If we take special sessions from now to New Years, we will hold them and we wills send the bill to Leader Bauer and to the Democratic party of Indiana.
I see no reasons for that to be necessary, they can come back and I hope they will, tomorrow.  We can just get on with business and that is what I would appeal to them to do.  I hope as a whole group, if not then maybe perhaps, individuals in the caucus who have gone along because that is what good caucus members do but may decide their conscience tells them they should do their duty instead.



No comments: